Impeachment proceedings involving Vice President Sara Duterte continue to draw legal commentary as the House of Representatives processes the complaints, with lawyer Paolo Panelo offering his interpretation of the procedure.
In a Facebook post, Panelo Jr. said the impeachment process does not hinge on whether a respondent files an answer, arguing that the rules allow the case to move forward even without one. He wrote, “VP Sara didn’t even have to file an answer! Under Rule III, Section 6 of the House Impeachment Rules, the complaint is deemed denied if no answer is filed, which does not preclude the respondent from presenting evidence in support of her defenses.”
His remarks come as discussions continue on procedural matters in the case, including the exchange of pleadings and how responses are treated under impeachment rules.
Panelo Jr. framed the issue as procedural, emphasizing that the absence or timing of an answer does not stop the process or determine the outcome. He also pointed to Senate trial rules, which allow proceedings to continue as if a plea of not guilty had been entered if an impeached official does not appear or respond after proper service.
Earlier developments in the House showed that two complaints were found sufficient in form and substance, while another was withdrawn. The process remains ongoing, with further steps required before any potential transmission to the Senate.
Panelo Jr.’s post reflects a legal interpretation of impeachment procedure and is not an official position from the Vice President’s camp.
